On Saturday, speaking through TETFund’s Sonny Echono at a convocation in Azare, President Bola Tinubu said federal universities are exempt from obtaining recruitment waivers from the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, a step documented in recent agreements with university staff unions.
The news deserves a welcome, but a cautious one. Nigerian education policy has a long habit of announcing freedoms that institutions never quite get to use. For one thing Waivers made hiring a postal exercise. A department loses a lecturer, and the replacement waits on correspondence in Abuja.
The problem is old: a House of Representatives motion noted that universities had piles of academic and non-academic vacancies they could not fill under the hiring ban, even though personnel budgets could cover them. Returning hiring decisions to the people who see the gaps is sensible. It is also labour diplomacy. ASUU spent 669 days on strike under the Buhari administration, the longest of any president since 1999. Any measure that removes a union grievance is worth something.
Now the scepticism. We have been here before. In December 2023, the then education minister announced that federal tertiary institutions could recruit without prior waivers from the Head of Service. Yet in April 2025, the Education Ministry was directing institutions “granted waivers” to advertise vacancies, and reminding them to submit recruitment needs to its Committee on Waiver and Recruitment. The waiver never fully disappeared. It appears to have changed address.
If the same promise needs repeating in 2026, the honest question is what failed in implementation, and what is different this time.That question matters because of where the gate now sits. Tinubu said the measure empowers the Federal Ministry of Education and university governing councils to handle staff recruitment. Read carefully, the checkpoint has moved from one federal office to another. Autonomy is real only if councils can hire without a second round of ministerial clearance.
From the reporting so far, the announcement came in remarks at a ceremony. I have not seen a circular or other instrument that tells registrars exactly what has changed. Until one exists, vice-chancellors are working from a speech.There is also a legitimate worry on the other side.
During the earlier waiver regime, a former Head of Service complained that federal universities were the worst offenders in breaching waivers, particularly by hiring non-academic staff the approvals did not cover. Her office had its own interests, so treat the claim with care. But anyone who has watched campus politics knows non-teaching appointments are where padding and favouritism tend to concentrate. Removing an external check without building an internal one invites exactly that. The 2025 directive that vacancies be advertised in a national daily, on institutional websites and in academic journals is a useful start. It should become a standing rule that applies to every institution, not a condition attached to a waiver that no longer exists.
Here is the part the announcement doesn’t mention: money. A waiver was never the only thing standing between a university and a new hire. Every appointment needs a funded personnel line. The same agreements behind this reform also commit government to paying the Consolidated Academic Tools Allowance and the Consolidated Non-Teaching Tools Allowance, effective January 1, 2026. That raises the wage bill institutions must carry. Freedom to recruit without funding to pay recruits yields one of two outcomes: vacancies that stay vacant, or staff hired and then left unpaid. Neither is autonomy.
If the reform is serious, four things should follow. First, a published instrument that spells out what changed, and says whether the ministry’s waiver committee is being dissolved or merely renamed. Second, a mandatory public-disclosure rule for vacancies and appointments across all cadres. Third, personnel-cost funding in the 2027 budget that matches the hiring freedom now promised. Fourth, a clear statement of what the ministry may still review and on what grounds, so that oversight does not quietly become a veto.
None of this is an argument against the decision. Removing a layer of bureaucracy from university hiring is right. But the test of autonomy is not the speech that grants it. It is whether a head of department in a federal university can get a replacement hired this academic year, fairly and with a salary attached. Abuja has said yes. The faculties will say whether it is true.—
Sources
[Tinubu scraps recruitment waiver requirement for federal universities (Parrot Nigeria)](https://parrotnigeria.com/2026/10/18/tinubu-scraps-recruitment-waiver-requirement-for-federal-universities/)-
[Tinubu Grants Federal Universities Autonomy To Recruit Staff (The Whistler)](https://thewhistler.ng/tinubu-grants-federal-universities-autonomy-to-recruit-staff/)-
[FEC exempts varsities, polytechnics, others from IPPIS (ICIR)](https://www.icirnigeria.org/fec-exempts-varsities-polytechnics-others-from-ippis/)-
[FG orders federal tertiary institutions to publicly advertise job vacancies (Nairametrics)](https://nairametrics.com/?p=513049)-
[FG Mandates Transparent Recruitment Process (Federal Ministry of Education statement)](https://fmino.gov.ng/fg-mandates-transparent-recruitment-process-in-federal-tertiary-institutions/)-
[Head of Service Accuses MDAs Of Abusing Recruitment Waivers (Leadership)](https://leadership.ng/?p=134588)-
[Lift ban on recruitment in Universities (VON)](https://von.gov.ng/lift-ban-on-recruitment-in-universities-reps-urges-federal-government/)
Leave a comment